Idle Remorse

Review: Heart♥throb

Review: Heart♥throb
Publisher: Milton Bradley
Year: 1988
Tagline: The Dream Date Game

Cover is pink and shows a girl smiling and three boys in heart shapes

how we met

Unfortunately I am not one of the lucky ones that grew up playing Heart♥throb. I came to learn about Heart♥throb as an adult! I came to publish this review at this time to align with an interview with Heart♥throb “Chuck” over at Happimess Media, so hop on over and check that out. I came to own Heart♥throb after Bill bought it for me as an anniversary gift last year. He’s so dreamy!

how it plays

In Heart♥throb, players are trying to decide which boy they most admire as well as which boy is most admired by their friends. Start by placing 3 boys into the little pink trays for easy viewing. The game has three rounds. 

Round 1: Would you like to dance? Technically in this round all three boys are asking you and your friends to the dance, but you write down the name of your favorite boy just based on their looks. Then you write down which of the boys you think is the favorite for each of your friends as well. 

After all players have finished choosing their boy and a boy for each player, they take turns announcing which boy was their favorite. Indicate on your score pad where you get the answer right as each right answer is worth one point! 

The score sheet laid out like a table where you place your answers
The most hardcore players I know use laminated score sheets

Round 2: Will you go on a date with me? In this round, you get a little more information by playing 2 PERSONALITY CARDs on each boy. This is done by one player playing a card from the yellow deck on each boy, face up, and a card from the green deck on each boy, face up. Read the cards aloud as they are placed. Then repeat the steps of choosing your favorite boy and who you think your friends chose. Did something change your mind?

Yellow card examples include "nicknamed 'Muffin'" and "school bully"
The yellow cards are pretty much about high school reputation. Things like nicknames and activities.
Green sample cards include "Wants to write romance novels" and "Working toward the perfect tan"
Green cards really focus on aspirations, as you can see here

After all players have finished writing down their boy and their guesses, score the round again. Then move onto…

Round 3: Do you want to go steady? In this round, each boy gets 2 more PERSONALITY CARDs, from the peach and the purple decks. Which of the boys is your favorite now? Which do you think your friends are eyeing up?

Peach samples include "scuba dives for sunken treasure" and "enjoys dancing close, real close"
Peach cards are really about hobbies and habits of our boys
Sample purple cards include "has dog breath" and "chews tobacco"
Purple is where your affection may really be challenged. All decks have cards that could be perceived as negative, but few crushes escape purple unscathed

After all players have finished then announce your chosen boys and score the round one last time. 

Add up your score for each round. The player with the most points wins! 

how it went

At any given time, I have about 20-30 games that I have played but not yet reviewed or published, and Heart♥throb is one of these games. I have played it several times with several different groups over the past year and a half. And it’s funny how no one balks at the game. It is simple to pick up, does not take long to play and is a wonderful snapshot in time. And frequently multiple rounds get played. 

The boys with their cards at the end of our first play
Our first play

You will see in the BGG comments that Heart♥throb developed some attention and fandom from the podcast Flip the Table (check out the Podcast if you have not already). I would even characterize Heart♥throb as one of their mascots, along with The McDonalds Game. And while that might seem really silly, Heart♥throb is bewitching in its simplicity. And worthy of this attention. Let me tell you why. 

Choosing the boys that you prefer is a simple deception; the game is really about knowing your fellow players. If Trevor left eggs in his trunk for 12 hours, I know very well that Keri is going to reject him.

A score sheet showing Bill as the player and where Jen and Keri both choose Luke the entire time
I find this score sheet so hilarious! #teamluke

But is Keri playing to her heart? I would hope so but another way to play is to just randomize your preferred boy each turn and randomize points earned through you by other players. I think there is a method to Bill’s madness, but this is closer to his play style.

Heart♥throb revealed itself to the universe as a 1988 game with boys and their come-hither looks, and with their personality traits revealed slowly as we approach the climax of the game. This is a formula, and this formula can be applied beyond 1988 boys. My clever friend Melissa created both a Heart♥throb: The Next Generation (Star Trek Heart-throb) and a Victorian Heart♥throb, which were amazing. Flip Florey from Flip the Table is revered for sharing BarkThrob across the world, a version focused on dogs and created by fan of the podcast Brian Gelfond

The cover shows Patrick Stewart in a robe with his legs crossed
The cover of Heart♥throb: The Next Generation. It even has the Crystalline Entity in it – almost as exciting as how much leg is showing in this photo

Imagine that the Flip the Table podcast is Christian Slater in Pump Up the Volume, and they are getting busted for having a Heart♥throb radio show. And at the end of the movie, as Samantha Mathis is driving the crew around the high school lawn, they urge you to take this thing that they made a big deal and run with it. Take charge of it! Steal the air! Keep it alive! A lot of people have done this, and it not only works but has been amazing. My props go to the creators of these versions, but with an acknowledgement that Heart♥throb made it possible, and Flip the Table was the catalyst for a revival of the game in recent years. 

And even for me personally.. I met some really great people through having this blog. I met my friend Courtney, and through her I met additional loving, supportive and funny people. I met Stef when our paths crossed over Girl Talk: Secret Diary. The kind of thing that could have happened and passed, so easily. But I then started reading her Happimess Media blog, following her on Instagram, syncing up Heart♥throb blog entries.

It sounds really random, right? And it kind of is. But I also think if you took me, Courtney, her entire game group, Stef, Flip the Table and laid all of us out on a cork board with pins and string and everything, Heart♥throb would be right there in the middle. Shy but confident. Unassuming but drawing all of us together. 

FUN FACT: Did you know that Chris Evans was a model in 2000’s Electronic Mystery Date Board Game? You know, Cap? The good guy, fish out of water, had Georges♥St-Pierre in one of his movies?

Now, no Heart♥throb review would be complete (or forgivable really) without a closer look at some of these boys. So without further ado….

Neil is sitting down but looking up coyly and wearing a black hat
Neil and I probably could have quoted Debbie Gibson lyrics to each other
Jim is wearing bicycle shorts and carrying a bicycle
This one is for you, Keri
Bobby is wearing a white tanktop and combing his hair to show his muscles off
Does Snapchat know about you, Bobby?
Randy is holding a football and wearing a jersey, but the jersey shows bare midriff
Football? Dancer? Need more info!
Perry is wearing an overcoat and a hat
See you in drama class, Perry
Luke has one foot up on a surface and hands on hip, looking at you sideways very seriously
Oh now I remember.. #teamluke

play or pass

Play. Play with anyone you know for nice, clean fun. Girl games get a lot of play in this house; there is something charming about their ham-handed attempts at gaming. If you could boil a girl game down to its essentials, I think Heart♥throb would emerge as perhaps the purest girl game matter. There is something simple and addictive about the concept and its execution. 

Review: AdVersity

Review: AdVersity
Publisher: Fundex games
Year: 2003
Tagline: The Game of Crazy Mixed-Up Ads

Cover just says Adversity with Max Madison holding a banner saying, "The game of crazy mixed-up ads"

how we met

Bill picked this up on one of his outings because it was a couple bucks and not played; everything was still in plastic. Our group tends to have fun with party games, even if it’s just a play or two, so it seemed like a safe bet. It sat on the shelf for awhile and then joined us for Thanksgiving!

how it plays

The object of the game is to earn money by successfully guessing which ad slogans your fellow players will match to products. Ultimately players are trying to get enough money to first purchase a SpokesAnimal followed by a SpokesPerson followed by the one and only Max Madison. The first player to purchase Max Madison wins! 

Max Madison pawn
The man himself, but slightly out of focus from the neck up #mybad

Players are called agencies in this game, and they start with 1 VOTER card, 5 AD SLOGAN cards and $100k cash. The agency to go first flips over a PRODUCT card. These cards have four different, numbered products on them. 

Product card shows 1. Preparation H 2. Turtle Wax 3. handcuffs 4. gasoline
This shows a sample PRODUCT card

Each agency then flips over, face down in front of them, one of the AD SLOGAN cards in their hands to represent one of the products on the PRODUCT card. This starts off a round of sorts, where the first agency – the one flipping the PRODUCT card – becomes the first Advertiser and flips over their AD SLOGAN card, face up, and reads it out loud. They then adjust their VOTER card to represent the product their slogan is meant for. Other agencies adjust their own VOTER cards to represent which product they think the first agency is advertising with their slogan. 

Once all agencies are ready, the Advertiser reveals their intended product by presenting it as though it were an ad, like, “Cover Girl. Why should your face get all the attention?” All other agencies boo and hiss or celebrate and rejoice depending on whether their own choices match. The Advertiser receives $100k for each fellow agency they match with, and each agency receives $100k for their correct guess. If no agencies matched their product it is called a BIG FLOP and the Advertiser must pay $200k to the bank for being sucky. 

Sample slogans are "Feel free to act on impulse," "Just how mad is she?," "He knows how to give goose bumps"
A sampling of ad slogans picked at random

The next player then becomes the Advertiser on the same PRODUCT card (remember, they put their own AD SLOGAN card down too). Rinse and repeat for all players. 

After each round where all agencies have had the opportunity to be Advertisers, they are allowed the opportunity to purchase SpokesCelebrities, which are winning conditions in the game. They also get their AD SLOGAN card replaced. 

Cartoons of a dog, toads, a fat man eating ice cream and a man wearing a smokey bear outfit
A random sampling of SpokesCelebrities. I have another photo showing the toads in perfect condition so remember, kids, always be careful when putting your games away

You can choose not to purchase SpokesCelebrities if you do not have ample money. The problem is that if you have a BIG FLOP and not enough cash to pay in, you must sell one of your SpokesCelebrities for much less than you purchased it for. 

SpokesAnimals cost agencies $500k to purchase. SpokesPersons are $800k. Max Madison costs $1 million dollars! There are several animals and persons to choose from but only one Max Madison, so these SpokesCelebrities need to be purchased in order. 

The first player to be so rich they can purchase Max Madison wins! 

how it went

I am so bad at this game, it should be studied. But I’m getting ahead of myself. 

The components are fine. I liked the VOTER cards, and there are a lot of AD SLOGAN cards in the box. It’s also nice that you can choose your SpokesCelebrities. Silly and unnecessary but much appreciated (when I finally bought one). 

Vote card where a spinner on the sides changes the number in the front window
The VOTER cards are chunky and work well

Silly and unnecessary but less appreciated was the style of the rules. We play a lot of games, and silly flavor comments in game rules could not be less appreciated. If you make a game and insist on dumb, cutesy flavor text please make it simple for my eyes to pass over and not read. Please? 

We played this during a longer game day. It was a nice break in the sense that it was simple and had the potential for party game humor – which is our humor inserted into card combinations. Simple, fun, quick. 

But AdVersity has a major, major flaw to it. As an Advertiser, you do best when the most players agree with you. There is no punishment if your ad is so obvious that all agencies can pick it out every time. Many party games in this vein do punish you for making obvious choices. But not AdVersity! There is zero incentive to be odd, unique, funny in a strange way, thoughtful. You succeed by not being yourself or thinking really. Just match your best card with the best product. So dull. It was so dull! 

Products include Slim Jim and laxatives
A picture of our play that really doesn’t show much of anything. Enjoy!

I get that in advertising this is probably the ultimate goal. Know your audience and get the most eyeballs and clicks. But that does not a game make. 

I admire the fact that AdVersity uses actual ad slogans and products, just like my beloved Ad Liners which is a better game but also grittier and – prepare yourselves – with more obvious sexual innuendo. A lot of people in BGG comments still criticize the amount of sexual innuendo introduced with no effort into AdVersity, because those people still don’t realize the level of sexual innuendo in advertising every day. 

The sub-tagline of the game says a lot: Guaranteed to be the most hilarious game you’re holding right now!

In the end John laid his money down the quickest and bought Max Madison and won AdVersity! And we packed that thing up and moved on. 

play or pass

Pass! I have a weakness for party games and this is still a big pass, all in lights. This game introduces you to your blandest self, or you lose, or you don’t play in the first place. I like that last one best. 

Review: Clay to Win

Review: Clay to Win
Publisher: Coleco Industries
Year: 1988
Tagline: The Only Game You’ll Ever Knead!

Cover has Clay to Win written in clay in blue

HOW WE MET

This is one that Bill brought home from a day out. So even though I was not the one to make the important decision to spend $2 on it, I certainly would have. The cover is weird and dated, and the tagline has to be amongst my favorites. 

It’s clear from the back of the box that this game is like Pictionary but with sculpting clay instead of drawing – something most of us have done if we have played Cranium. I wondered if there is enough fun there to carry the entire premise for a game, but I was hopeful because I enjoy that type of game. I only recently got rid of my childhood copy of Pictionary, and I still happily own Morphology. We used to play Win, Lose or Draw on the regular for game night. 

HOW IT PLAYS

Important note: I have to claim some creative freedom here. My copy of Clay to Win is missing the instructions (as well as the mats and knives). I did some frantic googling for instructions as we sat down to play, but it was difficult. The best I could find within a few minutes was someone that sold it on eBay several weeks ago and included a photo of the first page of instructions. But not the second page. 

Since I did not know what the winning condition was, we decided to just play to 10. With a four player game that went pretty evenly throughout, this ended up being a good game length and good call. 

I have since learned that the object of Clay to Win is to play until one team’s clay is all gone; then the other team wins! 

In Clay to Win players divide up into two different teams. One player rolls the die, which corresponds to a specific theme such as Anything Goes, People & Places, Sayings, Actions, Things or Choice. That player acts as the sculptor for their team and draws a card, then reads to themselves the item corresponding to the number that was rolled. They then pass the card to the sculptor on the opposite team. Once both sculptors know what they are trying to sculpt then they begin! 

 A poorly sculpted iron
You may need to sculpt an iron, for example

The first team to guess the correct thing (or saying or action etc) being sculpted gets one point. That team also gets to take the Clay to Win mold and take a piece of their opposing team’s clay. So the more you lose, the less clay you have. 

Small white mold that is shaped like a small circle and says Clay to Win
This is the mold that you use to steal clay from the other team
The Clay to Win circle clay stolen
An early steal because you can still see some colors

Play continues in this way, with teams taking turns rolling the die but sculpting simultaneously, until one team reaches 10 points (in our case). That team wins!

HOW IT WENT

Since we were missing sculpting knives, Keri fetched us fondue utensils. 

The clay was included in this used version, but it was old and hard and dry. John and Keri picked up Play-Doh for us to use instead. It was a mix-pack of several colors in small containers, so we each chose two colors for our clay to start. We eventually joined all of our clay into a single one for our team, but it was fun to start with two colors and start to mix them then combine with another two colors and start to mix those together for a team color. We knew we would always end up with a brown of some kind but it was fun to watch the progress. 

I wish I had taken more photos of our play because we had some interesting sculpts. It’s all about how the sculptor interprets breaking down the thing, and how the guesser interprets the sculpt. But guessers can see both team sculpts which can bring them a long way towards the right guess. 

A sculpt of a face
Some kind of face, I think?

The game was challenging, but it was not as impossible as I had assumed it would be. Here are a few of the examples I remember from our play:

  • GRAVEYARD SHIFT: Both John and I created graveyards so that part was done. I created a clock to try and indicate the shift, and we both made little dudes that did an actual job and got paid by someone else for it. Finally John made a gear shift and Keri was able to guess correctly. 
  • IRAN: This one probably included the most frustration and the most laughter. Bill sculpted a nice little world and I was able to determine that he wanted me to say a country in maybe eastern Europe? He pointed at it 500 times but I was not sure which region it really was. He probably did a great job, but geography is as dumb as I get. Meanwhile Keri sculpted a little man and started to make him move. This all went on for a couple of minutes until a light bulb went off and I guessed Iran. This is a good example of one I would not have been able to guess without both sculpts as clues. 
  • JOHNNY CASH: I started by sculpting money and then drew a dude with a guitar. John had a dude too, but he also made a ring of fire. Touché. Keri guessed it.

Our teams were pretty evenly matched and a lot of the time we were trading points. Eventually Bill and I established a lead of a few points and maintained that until we won. 

Sample cards showing Mississippi River, Love at first sight, add, scissors and more
Here is a random sampling of possible cards

Clay to Win was thoroughly enjoyable. I think one of the things the game has going for it is that I enjoyed guessing a sculpt and I enjoyed sculpting a sculpt. So each and every turn I was excited for what is happening next. And even though the stealing clay after scoring a point did not really affect much of anything, it was fun and we did it. 

A larger clay ball on the left and smaller clay ball on the right
The darker brown ball is slowly eating the lighter brown ball

It may be worth noting that we played without mats using Play-Doh on a wood table. The table was pretty disgusting after the game, but it cleaned up very easily with a quick spray down and wipe up. 

PLAY OR PASS

Play. I like this type of game, so I say play. Clay to Win is challenging by asking you to sculpt things that are sometimes un-sculptable, but if you break the thing down it is often very possible. Similar to Win, Lose or Draw or some other variant, there is a lot of laughter, frustration, confusion, pointing, nodding, encouraging, shaking of heads and going back to the drawing board. And I definitely enjoyed the punitive nature of stealing the other team’s clay. 

The game is not magic; if you do not enjoy this type of drawing or sculpting and guessing game then this will not change your mind. But we had a ball. A big, multi-colored brownish one. 

Review: Critter in the Candy!

Review: Critter in the Candy!
Publisher: Gabriel
Year: 1978
Tagline: Collect the most MAKE-BELIEVE CHOCOLATES to win – but don’t get the Critter in the Candy!

Critter in the Candy! cover showing brown chocolates against pink background, very 70's

HOW WE MET

Bill found this thrifting and was foolish enough to send me a photo asking whether I want it. I couldn’t look it up at the time, so my yes was based on that yummy pink cover. No regrets!

HOW IT PLAYS

Critter in the Candy! is a simple memory game for children. The chocolates have images on their bottom and roughly half are peanuts and half are cherries. They go face down on the table. Players take turns popping the Pop-O-Matic to see what chocolate they are looking for. You may pop a cherry or you may pop a peanut. 

The pop o matic showing die with cherry up
The gross, old Pop-O-Matic (it works great!)

You choose one of the chocolates and look at the bottom. If it matches your die then you keep it and the next player goes. One of the chocolates has a Critter on its bottom, though, so watch out! If you draw the Critter you must return one of your chocolates to the pile along with the Critter. 

The critter on the bottom of a chocolate
That pesky critter!

HOW IT WENT

We played this briefly during one longer game night. Sure it’s a kid’s game but it’s simple and I think it is kind of fun. It appeals to the gambler in me. Bill won our game but we used the honor system, which I do not recommend for adults. Or kids for that matter. 

Our play showing a hand reaching toward one of many plastic chocolates
Tell me that doesn’t look fun

PLAY OR PASS

Pass. I mostly wanted to share this game on the blog in case anyone out there has little ones and hadn’t heard of it. It’s a cute little memory game for young ones, but I’m about 35 years too old for it. 

Review: The Rainbow Gayme

Review: The Rainbow Gayme
Publisher: People Like Us
Year: 1992
Tagline: The Most Fun You’ll Have With Your Clothes On!

Cover looks like a package with purple yarn and the title The Rainbow Gayme

HOW WE MET

I did a little something kind of silly earlier this year, something I do not recommend. In my infinite wisdom, I decided to review the list of board games on Board Game Geek by year. I got through 3.5 years so far (1988, 1989, 1992 and half of 1993 I think). I judged the games by their names and covers, opened those that looked interesting and added several to my wish list. One of those was the Rainbow Gayme. 

I find very obscure games at thrift sometimes, but I think smaller independent vintage games rarely make it far from their origins. I actually hunted down a cheap copy of The Rainbow Gayme on eBay to fulfill my wishlist item. 

It has sat on my shelf for awhile, but we finally broke it out this past Thanksgiving in a fun gaming evening where we played four vintage games in addition to another chapter in Betrayal Legacy (which is awesome). 

HOW IT PLAYS

The Rainbow Gayme is a roll and move game where your goal is to land by exact count on the end of the rainbow. Then you win! The starting space is even a closet. 

The board has spaces showing colors of the rainbow and many illustrations
The colorful board

During the game, players must successfully complete the category of the space they are on. Once successful the player may roll a 10 sided die and move that many spaces. If you are unlucky enough to roll 0 then you must move backwards two spaces and lose your turn. 

The components including pawns, timer and small purple pencils
Yes the die is purple. Even the pencils are purple!

The spaces on the board are colored differently indicating different categories that must be completed within the 2 minute timer:

  • Orange – She Said : He Said: In this category another player will read you a quote and two people that may have said it. You choose which you think said the quote. 
  • Purple – A Matter of Choice: This is a multiple choice question about gay culture.
  • Blue – Group Grope: This category is kind of party game-ish where another player will read the card to you out loud, you write down how you would answer it and then each other player also guesses how they think the player would answer. If players match your answer, they may move ahead one space. If one or more players matched your answer then you may roll to continue moving. 
  • Red – Picture This: This category is a Pictionary-like drawing challenge where you must draw the term, article or symbol on the card. Similar to above, the person that guesses correctly may move ahead one space and you may roll. 
  • Yellow – Act Out: This is the charades category where you will be pantomiming terms, titles, and things related to the gay community. The game mercifully comes with a couple of cheat sheets for common charades movements to indicate things like “add an S” or “song title.” This cheat sheet was a huge help to me. 
  • Rainbow – Player’s Choice: choose your poison from the above categories.
The card box where cards are Red, Orange, Yellow, Blue and Purple
Because The Rainbow Gayme is so inclusive elsewhere, I will forgive it for excluding green here

When you near the end of the rainbow and start aiming for that last space on the board, play is normal except that if you roll higher than the number you need, you must move backward that amount. Yep. 

The first player to the end of the rainbow by exact count is the winner!

HOW IT WENT

(Note: we played so that players roll and move at the beginning of their turns, which caused our play to go a bit more quickly than normal play would)

I am not sure how well I understood what this game would be like when I tracked it down. I was honestly a little disappointed when I got it in the mail and saw that it is a combination of trivia, drawing and charades, kind of like a gay-themed Cranium. But I actually had a lot more fun playing it than I thought I would. The Rainbow Gayme borrows heavily from well-established and competent games, so while its approach might come off as a little clumsy the gameplay itself is approachable and fine. We had fun. 

I didn’t feel like our play was overly short or overly long, so I am happy we changed the rules to regular roll and move so none of us got stuck in categories that we struggled with, like trivia. I was rolling very well, so I was really trucking around the board. Bill managed to move one space out of the closet and then roll a 0, placing him firmly back in the closet at the beginning of play and causing him to pretend to flip the table. He generally rolled poorly and was in the back for most of the game, but the requirement of rolling by exact count to end the game meant that we all kind of stacked up at the end there. 

The board has many illustrations, as you have seen by now. But what is harder to notice from photos is that the four sides of the board each state one of these themes: oppression, freedom, challenge and unity. The illustrations represent these themes. Let’s take a closer look at some of them.

A dance club showing dancers having a good time
Loving this representation of Freedom
Showing arrests and military discharges
The Oppression sections are troubling, as they should be
A car of people yelling "Dykes" at two people walking their dogs
Another in the Oppression section
Illustration of the AIDS Memorial Quilt in Washington
The AIDS Memorial Quilt makes an appearance in the Challenge section
Large motorcycle group and large parade
The Unity section is appropriately large groups of people
Two people hiking, one in a wheelchair
See? Inclusive
A picture of women on an island with sign Isle of Lesbos
Rounding it out with another Freedom illustration

One of the common criticisms of The Rainbow Gayme that you are likely to encounter, fairly, is that it is dated. Oh is it dated. I would be curious how many people in the gay community know much of the trivia or terms or movies or books or references, particularly from a 2018 perspective. 

For some reason a lot of us were landing on the same categories multiple times. I had to pantomime several times, and as mentioned earlier that cheat sheet was a lifesaver for me. I had to get my fellow players to guess the play As Is. That was difficult but I managed it with all the little shorthand. And I did look up the play later to learn more about it. 

The shorthand sheets for charades
If you ever need to do charades, keep this image handy

I enjoyed teasing Keri when she was trying to draw out the term “sex club.” She was clearly drawing sex but I kept guessing things like being intimate, making love, coupling, knowing biblically. Super fun. A game within a game.

We did find one factual error in the cards related to the period Amelia Earhart was alive. Not a huge deal, but it contributed to the player missing that question so we had to re-do their play. 

One card from each category
A sample card from each category for your eyes

The goal of the Rainbow Gayme is to teach people about the gay community in a fun and light-hearted way. I guess it accomplishes this, but also feels very narrow and focused. It’s a niche game. You would be able to learn about contributions from the gay community, which is nice. But it also feels like minutiae because it is so dry at times and seems to focus on a very specific time period. And the takeaway is trivia. 

Generally the focused trivia board games (typically related to a TV show more often than a topic) are enjoyed by those that already have an appreciation and knowledge of the subject matter. Their goal is not to teach but just to test your knowledge. If the goal of The Rainbow Gayme is to teach, I think it could have been approached differently. Like even just giving the cards more context that can be read, so I not only know As Is is a 1985 play by William Hoffman but also the subject matter instead of trying to remember it to look it up later. 

In the end I managed to roll the magic number I needed to get to the end and I won the Rainbow Gayme! 

PLAY OR PASS

Pass. The game has a noble goal, and it probably fulfilled that goal to a certain extent for a certain time period to a very specific audience after it was released. But it just doesn’t stand the test of time for a casual gamer. 

Newer Posts
Older Posts